Sequence-based population structure, relatedness, and inbreeding estimates for forensic autosomal STR markers.

Population data have become available for sequence data to aid forensic investigations and prepare the forensic community in the move towards implementing NGS methods. This comes with a need for updated population genetic parameters estimates to allow DNA evidence evaluations using sequence data. Initial work has been done on a small sample and here we expand this work by providing estimates of population structure and relatedness for autosomal STR data generated by sequencing technologies. We also discuss the effect of inbreeding on forensic calculations and discuss why the use of genotypic-based estimates may be preferred over allelic-based estimates.

Perceptions of forensic scientists on statistical models, sequence data, and ethical implications for DNA evidence evaluations: A qualitative assessment.

With the introduction of next generation sequencing (NGS) technology in the forensic field, it will be of interest to assess if forensic scientists feel equipped to interpret and present DNA evidence for sequence data. Here, we describe perceptions of sixteen U.S.-based forensic scientists on statistical models, sequence data, and ethical implications for DNA evidence evaluations. To get an in-depth understanding of the current situation, we used a qualitative research approach with a cross-sectional study design. Semi-structured interviews (N = 16) were conducted with U.S. forensic scientists working with DNA evidence. Open-ended interview questions were used to explore participants' views and needs surrounding the use of statistical models and sequence data for forensic purposes. We conducted a conventional content analysis using ATLAS. ti software and employed a second coder to ensure reliability of our results. Eleven themes emerged: 1) a statistical model that maximizes the value of the evidence is preferred; 2) a high-level understanding of the statistical model used is generally sufficient; 3) transparency is key in minimizing the risk of creating black boxes; 4) training and education should be an ongoing effort; 5) the effectiveness of presenting results in court can be improved; 6) NGS has the potential to become revolutionary; 7) some hesitations surrounding the use of sequence data remain; 8) there is a need for a concrete plan to alleviate barriers to the implementation of sequencing techniques; 9) ethics plays a major part in the role of a forensic scientist; 10) ethical barriers for sequence data depend on the application; 11) DNA evidence has its limitations. The results of this study give insight into the perceptions of forensic scientists regarding the use of statistical models and sequence data, providing valuable information in the move towards implementing sequencing methods for DNA evidence evaluations.

Analyzing population structure for forensic STR markers in next generation sequencing data.

Match probabilities calculated during the evaluation of DNA evidence profiles rely on appropriate values of the population structure quantity θ. NGS-based methods will enhance forensic identification and with the transformation to such methods comes the need to facilitate NGS-based population genetics analysis. If NGS data are to be used for match probabilities there needs to be a way to accommodate population structure, which requires values for θ for those data. Such estimates have not been available. This study assesses population structure for sequence-based data using a relatively new approach applied to STR data over 27 loci in five different geographic groups. Matching proportions between individuals or groups are used to obtain locus-specific θ estimates as well as estimates per geographic group and a global measure. The results demonstrate similar effects of sequencing data on θ estimates compared to what has been seen for CE-based results.